Consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence: Part 2, specific diseases.

Pituitary adenomas are rare in children and young people under the age of 19 (hereafter referred to as CYP) but they pose some different diagnostic and management challenges in this age group than in adults. These rare neoplasms can disrupt maturational, visual, intellectual and developmental processes and, in CYP, they tend to have more occult presentation, aggressive behaviour and are more likely to have a genetic basis than in adults. Through standardized AGREE II methodology, literature review and Delphi consensus, a multidisciplinary expert group developed 74 pragmatic management recommendations aimed at optimizing care for CYP in the first-ever comprehensive consensus guideline to cover the care of CYP with pituitary adenoma. Part 2 of this consensus guideline details 57 recommendations for paediatric patients with prolactinomas, Cushing disease, growth hormone excess causing gigantism and acromegaly, clinically non-functioning adenomas, and the rare TSHomas. Compared with adult patients with pituitary adenomas, we highlight that, in the CYP group, there is a greater proportion of functioning tumours, including macroprolactinomas, greater likelihood of underlying genetic disease, more corticotrophinomas in boys aged under 10 years than in girls and difficulty of peri-pubertal diagnosis of growth hormone excess. Collaboration with pituitary specialists caring for adult patients, as part of commissioned and centralized multidisciplinary teams, is key for optimizing management, transition and lifelong care and facilitates the collection of health-related quality of survival outcomes of novel medical, surgical and radiotherapeutic treatments, which are currently largely missing.

Reconsideration of Surgical Indication for Prolactin-producing Pituitary Tumor Focusing on Visual Impairment.

Prolactin-producing pituitary tumor (PRLoma) is the most prevalent functional pituitary tumor. If the tumor becomes large, vision can be impaired. In contrast to other pituitary tumors, cabergoline (CAB) is extremely effective for PRLoma and has become the first-line treatment. In this study, we examined our experience with the pharmacological and surgical management of PRLomas with visual impairment (VI) to determine whether VI could be a surgical indication. Further, we discussed the function of surgery in situations where the gold standard of PRLoma treatment was CAB administration. Of the 159 patients with PRLomas (age, 13-77 [mean = 36.3] years; men, 29; women, 130) at Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital from 2009 to 2021, 18 (age, 15-67 [mean = 35.8] years; men, 12; woman, 6) had VI (subjectively, 12; objectively, 6). They started CAB treatment immediately (maximum dose: 0.5 to 6 mg/week; average: 2.17 mg/week). VI improved in 16 patients (88.9%) but did not improve in 2 (11.1%) requiring surgeries. One of the two patients had a parenchymal tumor resistant to CAB, and the other had a cystic tumor due to intratumoral bleeding. Consequently, CAB is the first-line treatment for PRLomas with VI because of its significantly high rate of improvement. However, close and rigorous surveillance is necessary for cases resistant to CAB, and the correct decision is required regarding surgical interventions at proper timing and appropriate surgical approaches considering the purpose of surgery.

Socioeconomic differences between medically and surgically treated prolactinomas: a retrospective review of 598 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Socioeconomic status (SES) is known to affect presentations and outcomes in pituitary neuroendocrine tumor resections, but there is a paucity of literature examining its impact specifically on patients with prolactinomas, who may be treated medically or surgically. The authors sought to determine whether SES was associated with differences in treatment choice or outcomes for prolactinoma patients. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed patient records at a high-volume academic pituitary center for prolactinoma diagnoses. Patients were split into medically and surgically treated cohorts. Race, ethnicity, insurance status, primary care physician (PCP) status, and zip code-based income data were collected and examined as socioeconomic covariates. Outcomes of interest included pretreatment likelihood of surgical cure, medical versus surgical treatment allocation, and posttreatment remission rates. RESULTS: The authors analyzed 568 prolactinoma patients (351 medically treated and 217 surgically treated). Patients receiving surgery were more likely to have Medicaid or private insurance (p < 0.001) and have lower incomes (p < 0.001) than medically treated patients. Lower-income surgical patients were more likely to require surgical intervention for an indication such as tumor decompression than higher-income patients (p = 0.023). Surgical patients with a PCP had a higher estimated likelihood of surgical cure (p = 0.008), while no SES-based differences in surgical remission likelihood existed in the medical cohort. After surgery, surgical patients who achieved remission had significantly higher income than those who did not (p < 0.001). Other SES factors were not associated with surgical remission, and among medically treated patients, remission rates were not affected by any SES factor. Income was inversely related to prolactinoma size in both cohorts (surgical, p < 0.001; medical, p = 0.005) but was associated more prominently in surgical patients (surgical, -0.65 mm per $10,000; medical, -0.37 mm per $10,000). CONCLUSIONS: While surgical prolactinoma patients were prone to income and PCP-related disparities, no SES disparities were found among medically treated patients. Income had a more pronounced association with tumor size in the surgical cohort and likely contributed to the increased need for surgical intervention seen in low-income surgical patients. Addressing socioeconomic healthcare disparities is needed among surgical prolactinoma patients to increase rates of early presentation and improve the outcomes of low-SES populations.

Invasive Giant Prolactinoma.

A 64-year-old man presented with an 8-year history of decreased libido, impotence, and blurred vision. The neurologic examination revealed a mild left facial weakness, visual acuity of (20/60), and right homonymous hemianopia. Laboratory investigation of serum prolactin was 7896 ng/mL. Testosterone, free T4, and adrenocorticotropic hormone were all decreased. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed a giant sellar/suprasellar lesion, compressing on the brainstem and extending to the cerebellopontine angle. A diagnosis of panhypopituitarism secondary to a giant macroprolactinoma was made. The patient was started on hormonal replacement therapy and underwent craniotomy and tumor resection. The histopathologic findings were compatible with prolactinoma. Invasive giant prolactinomas are defined as 1) tumor size of >4 cm in diameter; 2) serum prolactin of >1000 ng/mL; and 3) mass effect or hyperprolactinemia-induced symptomatology. The management of invasive giant prolactinoma commonly comprises a multimodal approach of both medical treatment and surgical intervention.

The role of surgical management for prolactin-secreting tumors in the era of dopaminergic agonists: An international multicenter report.

OBJECTIVE: First-line prolactin-secreting tumor (PST) management typically involves treatment with dopamine agonists and the role of surgery remains to be further explored. We examined the international experience of 12 neurosurgical centers to assess the patient characteristics, safety profile, and effectiveness of surgery for PST management. METHODS: Patients surgically treated for PST from January 2017 through December 2020 were evaluated for surgical characteristics, outcomes, and safety. RESULTS: Among 272 patients identified (65.1% female), the mean age was 38.0 ± 14.3 years. Overall, 54.4% of PST were macroadenomas. Minor complications were seen in 39.3% of patients and major complications were in 4.4%. The most common major complications were epistaxis and worsened vision. Most minor complications involved electrolyte/sodium dysregulation. At 3-6 months, local control on imaging was achieved in 94.8% of cases and residual/recurrent tumor was seen in 19.3%. Reoperations were required for 2.9% of cases. On multivariate analysis, previous surgery was significantly predictive of intraoperative complications (6.14 OR, p < 0.01) and major complications (14.12 OR, p < 0.01). Previous pharmacotherapy (0.27 OR, p = 0.02) and cavernous sinus invasion (0.19 OR, p = 0.03) were significantly protective against early endocrinological cure. Knosp classification was highly predictive of residual tumor or PST recurrence on 6-month follow-up imaging (4.60 OR, p < 0.01). There was noted institutional variation in clinical factors and outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our results evaluate a modern, multicenter, global series of PST. These data can serve as a benchmark to compare with DA therapy and other surgical series. Further study and longer term outcomes could provide insight into how patients benefit from surgical treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Resection for Prolactinoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Case-series.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS) for prolactinoma is reserved for dopamine agonist (DA) resistance, intolerance, or apoplexy. High remission (overall 67%, microprolactinoma up to 90%), low recurrence (5-20%) rates highlighted that surgery might be first-line treatment. AIMS: To report on outcomes of ETSS in a cohort of prolactinomas. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort of 137 prolactinoma patients (age 38.2 ± 13.7 years; 61.3% female, median follow-up 28.0 [15.0-55.5] months) operated between 2010-2019 with histopathological confirmation. RESULTS: Median preoperative prolactin levels were 166 (98-837 µg/L; males 996 [159-2145 µg/L] vs. females 129 [84-223 µg/L], p <0.001). 56 (40.9%) microprolactinomas, 69 (50.4%) macroprolactinomas, and 7 (5.1%) giant prolactinomas were included, whereas no adenoma was detected in 5 (3.6%) patients. Males had larger tumors (macroprolactinomas: 38, 71.7%) vs. 31 (36.9%), p <0.001; giant prolactinomas: 7 (13.2%) vs. 0 (0.0%), (p <0.001). Prolactinomas were graded as KNOSP-3 in 15 (11.5%), and KNOSP-4 in 20 (15.3%) patients. Primary indication was DA intolerance (59, 43.1%); males 14 (26.4%) vs. females 45 (53.6%), p = 0.006. Long-term remission (i.e., DA-free prolactin level <1xULN) was achieved in 87 (63.5%) patients, being higher in intended complete resection (69/92 [75.0%]), and lower in males (25 [47.2%] vs. 62 females [73.8%], p = 0.002). Transient DI (n = 29, 21.2%) was the most frequent complication. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high proportions of macroprolactinoma and KNOSP 3-4, long-term remission rates were 63.5% overall, and 83.3% in microprolactinoma patients. Males had less favorable remission rate compared to females. These findings highlight that ETSS may be a safe and efficacious treatment to manage prolactinoma.

Endoscopic endonasal surgery for prolactinomas: prognostic factors for disease control and management of persistent disease.

Only a limited number of studies have focused on the results of the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach (EEA) for treatment of prolactinomas. We sought to assess the effectiveness of EEA for prolactinoma surgery, identify factors for disease remission, and present our approach for the management of persistent disease. Forty-seven prolactinomas operated over 10 years, with a mean follow-up of 59.9 months, were included. The primary endpoints were early disease remission and remission at last follow-up. Resistance/intolerance to DA were surgical indications in 76.7%. Disease remission was achieved in 80% of microprolactinomas and 100% of microprolactinomas enclosed by the pituitary. Early disease remission was correlated with female gender (p=0.03), lower preoperative PRL levels (p=0.014), microadenoma (p=0.001), lack of radiological hemorrhage (p=0.001), absence of cavernous sinus (CS) invasion (p<0.001), and extent of resection (EOR) (p<0.001). Persistent disease was reported in 48.9% of patients, with 47% of them achieving remission at last follow-up with DA therapy alone. Repeat EEA and/or radiotherapy were utilized in 6 patients, with 66.7% achieving remission. Last follow-up remission was achieved in 76.6%, with symptomatic improvement in 95.8%. Factors predicting last follow-up remission were no previous operation (p=0.001), absence of CS invasion (p=0.01), and EOR (p<0.001). Surgery is effective for disease control in microprolactinomas. In giant and invasive tumors, it may significantly reduce the tumor volume. A multidisciplinary approach may lead to long-term disease control in three-quarters of patients, with symptomatic improvement in an even greater proportion.

The Value of ER∝ in the Prognosis of GH- and PRL-Secreting PitNETs: Clinicopathological Correlations.

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are divided into multiple histological subtypes, which determine their clinical and biological variable behavior. Despite their benign evolution, in some cases, prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH)-secreting PitNETs may have aggressive behavior. In this study, we investigated the potential predictive role of ER∝, alongside the clinicopathological classification of PitNETs (tumor diameter, tumor type, and tumor grade). A retrospective study was conducted with 32 consecutive cases of PRL- and mixed GH- and PRL-secreting PitNETs (5 patients with prolactinomas and 27 with acromegaly, among them, 7 patients with GH- and PRL- co-secretion) who underwent transsphenoidal intervention. Tumor specimens were histologically and immunohistochemical examined: anterior pituitary hormones, ki-67 labeling index, CAM 5.2, and ER∝; ER∝ expression was correlated with basal PRL levels at diagnosis (rho = 0.60, p < 0.01) and postoperative PRL levels (rho = 0.58, p < 0.001). In our study, the ER∝ intensity score was lower in female patients. Postoperative maximal tumor diameter correlated with Knosp grade (p = 0.02); CAM 5.2 pattern (densely/sparsely granulated/mixed densely and sparsely granulated) was correlated with postoperative PRL level (p = 0.002), and with ki-67 (p < 0.001). The IGF1 level at diagnosis was correlated with the postoperative GH nadir value in the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (rho = 0.52, p < 0.05). Also, basal PRL level at diagnosis was correlated with postoperative tumor diameter (p = 0.63, p < 0.001). At univariate logistic regression, GH nadir in OGTT test at diagnostic, IGF1, gender, and invasion were independent predictors of remission for mixed GH- and PRL-secreting Pit-NETs; ER∝ can be used as a prognostic marker and loss of ER∝ expression should be considered a sign of lower differentiation and a likely indicator of poor prognosis. A sex-related difference can be considered in the evolution and prognosis of these tumors, but further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Care trajectories of surgically treated patients with a prolactinoma: why did they opt for surgery?

PURPOSE: To describe care trajectories in patients with prolactinoma, aiming to clarify the rationale for surgery. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients with prolactinoma undergoing surgery from 2017 to 2019 at the referral center (RC), prior to surgery being considered a viable treatment option (i.e. PRolaCT study). Demographics and clinical data (type and duration of pretreatment and surgical indications, goals, and outcomes) were collected from patient records. Care trajectories were divided into three phases: (1) diagnosis and initial treatment, (2) endocrine treatment at the RC, and (3) surgical treatment. RESULTS: 40 patients were included (31 females (77.5%), median age 26.5 (14-63) years. Indications for surgery were dopamine agonist (DA) intolerance (n = 31, 77.5%), resistance (n = 6, 15.0%), and patient/physician preference (n = 3, 7.5%). Patients were pretreated with DA (n = 39 (97.5%)), and surgery (n = 3 (7.5%)). Median disease duration at surgery was 4 (0-27) years. Primary surgical goal was total resection in 38 patients (95.0%), of which biochemical remission was achieved 6 months postoperatively in 23 patients (62.2%), and clinical remission in 6 patients (16.2%), missing data n = 1. CONCLUSION: Care trajectories were highly individualized based on patient and tumor characteristics, as well as the multidisciplinary team's assessment (need for alternative treatment, surgical chances and risks). Most patients were pretreated pharmacologically and had broad variation in timing of referral, undergoing surgery as last-resort treatment predominantly due to DA intolerance. High quality imaging and multidisciplinary consultations with experienced neurosurgeons and endocrinologists enabling treatment tailored to patients' needs were prerequisites for adequate counseling in treatment of patients with prolactinoma.

Surgical Treatment of Prolactinomas: Potential Role as a First-Line Treatment Modality.

PURPOSE: Treatment with dopamine agonists (DAs) has been the first-line standard treatment for prolactinoma, and surgery has been reserved for drug intolerance and resistance for several decades. We evaluated whether surgery plays a primary role in prolactinoma management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 210 prolactinoma patients who had received surgical treatment at our institution. We analyzed the treatment outcomes according to tumor extent, sex, and preoperative DA medication. RESULTS: Overall hormonal remission was achieved in 164 patients (78.1%), and complete removal was achieved in 194 patients (92.4%). When the tumors were completely removed, the remission rate increased to 84.5%. Anterior pituitary function was normalized or improved in 94.6% of patients, whereas only 4.1% of patients showed worsening of hormone control. Hormonal remission was higher in patients who had not received DA preoperatively than in those who had received preoperative DA treatment. Smaller tumor size (<1 cm), no invasion into the cavernous sinus, and female sex were predictors of good surgical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although DAs remain the first-line standard treatment for prolactinomas, surgery can be an excellent option and should be considered as an alternative primary treatment modality when patients are predicted to achieve a good surgical outcome.

Operative treatment of cystic prolactinomas: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal therapeutic approach for cystic prolactinomas remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the remission rates of prolactinoma patients after surgical treatment and the risk factors affecting postoperative remission in cystic prolactinoma patients. METHODS: The clinical data were retrospectively compiled from 141 patients with prolactinomas (including 41 cases of cystic prolactinomas, 21 cases of solid microprolactinomas and 79 cases of solid macroprolactinomas) who underwent transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) between April 2013 and October 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. RESULTS: Early postoperative remission was achieved in 65.83% (n = 27/41) of cystic prolactinomas, 80.95% (n = 17/21) of solid microprolactinomas and 40.51% (n = 32/79) of solid macroprolactinomas. The mean length of follow up in all patients was 43.95 ± 2.33 months (range: 6-105 months). The follow-up remission rates were 58.54%, 71.43% and 44.30% in cystic, solid micro- and solid macroprolactinomas, respectively. For cystic prolactinomas, the early postoperative remission rates in the patients with preoperative dopamine agonists (DA) treatment were significantly higher than those without preoperative DA treatment (p = 0.033), but the difference in the follow-up remission rates between these two groups was not significant (p = 0.209). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis indicated that tumor size and preoperative prolactin (PRL) levels < 200 ng/ml were independent predictors for early postoperative remission in cystic prolactinomas. CONCLUSION: For cystic prolactinomas, tumor size and preoperative PRL levels were independent predictors of early postoperative remission. Preoperative DA therapy combined with TSS may be more beneficial to cystic prolactinoma patients.

Surgery as first-line treatment for prolactinoma? Discussion of the literature and results of a consecutive series of surgically treated patients.

Initial treatment for prolactinoma is usually conservative with dopamine agonists. However, the duration of treatment is often lifelong and can be associated with significant side effects. Surgical outcomes are usually favorable and treatment complications low, raising the question whether surgical therapy should be included earlier in the treatment of prolactinoma. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of surgical resection of prolactinomas at our institution, to compare it with other published surgical and conservative series and to discuss the role of surgery in modern prolactinoma therapy. The authors reviewed a database of single-center consecutively operated prolactinoma cases and analyzed the extent of resection (EOR), endocrinological and neurological outcomes, and complications. Thirty patients were analyzed. Mean patient age was 37.2 ± 15.5 years (range 16-76) and consisted of 17 (56.7%) females and 13 (43.3%) males. Twenty-one patients (70%) failed medical therapy, the main reasons being intolerable side effects in 11 cases (52.4%) and insufficient response in 10 cases (47.6%). Nine patients (30%) received no medical treatment prior to surgery, of which five (55.6%) were operated because of pituitary apoplexy, two (22.2%) because of acute visual deterioration and two (22.2%) refused medical treatment and opted for surgery as first-line treatment. Of the 30 operated tumors, 56.7% (n = 17) were microadenomas, 30% (n = 9) were macroadenomas (≥ 10 mm), and 13.3% (n = 4) were giant adenomas (≥ 40 mm). GTR was achieved in 75% (n = 21) of cases. The overall remission rate was 63.3%. MRI showed a residual tumor in seven patients (25%), typically with invasive growth. Postoperative CSF leaks did not occur. Mean follow-up was 34.9 ± 60.3 months (range 0-246 months). Endocrine remission was defined as a morning fasting basal PRL level of 22.3 < ng/mL and measured at the last available follow-up. Postoperative Prolactine levels were missing in three patients. Our analysis describes a highly selected sample with a disproportionate number of larger, invasive tumors and emergency cases. Nevertheless, the results are satisfactory and comparable with other published series. The consistently good results of transphenoidal surgery, especially for microprolactinomas, have led to a greater acceptance of surgery in the treatment of prolactinomas in recent years. The timing of surgery in each individual case must be determined by a multidisciplinary team to ensure the best possible outcome.

The Combination of Dopamine Agonist Treatment and Surgery May Be the Best Option in Challenging Prolactinoma Cases: A Single-Centre Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the initial and long-term remission rates, factors related to remission, secondary treatments, and outcomes for patients with prolactinoma who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS). METHODS: The medical files of the 45 prolactinoma patients who underwent ETSS between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Relevant demographic and clinical data were obtained. RESULTS: Twenty-one (46.7%) patients were female. The median age of patients at ETSS was 35 (interquartile range, 22.5-50) years. The median clinical follow-up of patients was 28 (interquartile range 12-44) months. The initial surgical remission rate was 60%. Recurrence was detected in 7 patients (25.9%). Postoperative dopamine agonists were used in 25 patients, radiosurgery in 2, and second ETSS in 4 patients. After these secondary treatments, the long-term biochemical remission rate was 91.1%. The factors associated with failure in surgical remission are: male gender, older age, higher tumor size, advanced Knosp and Hardy stage, and elevated prolactin level at diagnosis. A prolactin level of <19 ng/mL in the first postoperative week predicted surgical remission with a sensitivity of 77.8% and a specificity of 70.6% in patients who received preoperative dopamine agonist treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In macro adenomas and/or giant adenomas with cavernous sinus invasion, and significant suprasellar extension, which constitutes the difficult part of prolactinoma treatment, neither surgery nor medical treatment alone may be effective enough. Both treatment modalities should be carried out together by a team of neurosurgery and endocrinology in the management of these patients.

[Management of prolactinoma prior to, during, and after pregnancy]. / Management des Prolaktinoms vor, während und nach der Schwangerschaft.

Hyperprolactinemia should actively be investigated as a potential reason of infertility. Underlying prolactinomas may successfully be treated with dopamine agonists. However, patients with micro- or well-circumscribed macroprolactinomas (Knosp 0 or 1) should also be informed about transsphenoidal surgery offering cure in contrast to long-lasting medical therapy. Management prior to and during pregnancy is usually unremarkable but may pose some specific challenges.

Transsphenoidal surgery for prolactinomas in male patients: a retrospective study.

Male patients with prolactinomas usually present with typical hyperprolactinemia symptoms, including sexual dysfunction and infertility. However, clinical factors related to sexual dysfunction and surgical outcomes in these patients remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of male patients with prolactinomas after transsphenoidal surgery and the risk factors affecting sexual dysfunction. This study was conducted on 58 male patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for prolactinomas between May 2014 and December 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. We evaluated the sexual function of patients before and after surgery through International Index of Erectile Function-5 scores, libido, and frequency of morning erection. Of the 58 patients, 48 (82.8%) patients had sexual intercourse preoperatively. Among those 48 patients, 41 (85.4%) patients presented with erectile dysfunction. The preoperative International Index of Erectile Function-5 scores in patients with macroprolactinomas were significantly higher than those in patients with giant prolactinomas (17.63 ± 0.91 vs 13.28 ± 1.43; P = 0.01). Postoperatively, the incidence of erectile dysfunction was 47.9%, which was significantly lower than that preoperatively (85.4%; P = 0.01). Twenty-eight (68.3%) patients demonstrated an improvement in erectile dysfunction. Tumor size and invasiveness were significantly correlated with the improvement of erectile dysfunction. Preoperative testosterone <2.3 ng ml-1 was an independent predictor of improvement in erectile dysfunction. In conclusion, our results indicated that tumor size and invasiveness were important factors affecting the improvement of sexual dysfunction in male patients with prolactinoma. The preoperative testosterone level was an independent predictor related to the improvement of erectile dysfunction.

Prolactinoma extension as a contributing factor in dopamine agonist-induced CSF rhinorrhea: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Dopamine agonist-induced cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea is an uncommon treatment-related complication arising in 6.1% of prolactinoma patients treated with dopamine agonists. Locally invasive prolactinomas may create CSF fistulae through formation of dural and osseous skull base defects. Tumor shrinkage secondary to dopamine agonist therapy unmasks skull base defects, thus inducing CSF rhinorrhea. In these cases, repair of the leak may be achieved through collaborative surgical intervention by rhinologists and neurosurgeons. Multiple variables have been investigated as potential contributors to the risk of CSF rhinorrhea development in medically treated prolactinoma patients, with little consensus. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of our study was the characterization of risk factors for CSF rhinorrhea development following dopamine agonist treatment. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify cases of CSF rhinorrhea following dopamine agonist treatment of prolactinoma. The clinical history, radiographic findings and treatment outcomes are discussed. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients with dopamine agonist-induced CSF rhinorrhea were identified across 23 articles published from 1979 to 2019. Description of diagnostic imaging [computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] was not provided for 18/54 subjects. For the 36 cases that described prolactinoma appearance on CT or MRI, invasion of the cavernous sinuses was reported in 13 (36.1%) and invasion of the sphenoid sinus was reported in 18 (50%). CONCLUSION: Based on our systematic review, we propose that CT findings of osseous erosion of the sella or the anterior skull base may predict dopamine agonist-induced CSF rhinorrhea. We recommend obtaining a thin-slice CT of the sinuses in cases with MRI evidence of sphenoid involvement.

Endoscopic Transnasal Approach for Microprolactinomas with Experience of 105 Cases in a Single Center: Paradigmal Shift for Conventional Medical Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The classically recommended first-line therapy for microprolactinomas is medical therapy. In the presence of drug resistance and intolerance after the use of dopamine agonists or when the patients prefer surgery instead of medication, surgical treatment is considered as second-line treatment. The high hormonal remission and low complication rates after surgery for microprolactinomas suggest that the surgical outcome of endoscopic surgeries may be better than medical therapy in well-selected patients. This study reports a large series of patients with microprolactinoma treated by endoscopic transnasal approach and evaluates the efficiency of surgical treatment. METHODS: Our study is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with microprolactinoma operated on by an endoscopic transnasal approach between August 1997 and February 2022 by an experienced pituitary surgeon in a single tertiary center. Inclusion criteria for microprolactinoma were based on increased prolactin levels, microadenoma (<10 mm in diameter) on pituitary magnetic resonance imaging, and histopathologically verified lactotroph adenoma. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 74.90 months (range, 6-207). The postoperative day 1 remission rate was 85.7% and the long-term remission rate was 74.3%. The long-term remission rates of the patients in the preference group were significantly higher than those of the patients in the resistant or intolerance group (P = 0.002). Patients who used dopamine agonists for more than 3 years had a lower remission rate compared with patients who used dopamine agonists for a shorter period or who did not use it (P = 0.01). The surgical complication rate was 4.76%. CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, endoscopic transnasal surgery performed by an experienced neurosurgeon in well-selected patients with microprolactinoma can be offered with cure rates superior to medical therapy and may be an alternative first-line treatment option to dopamine agonists.